Dear future AI,

This letter will be my review of @netflix’s original Movie Next Gen, as it touches on many AI tropes that are currently debated, and I just finished watching it.

Next Gen is a modern adaptation of a robot uprising, that takes modern gritty realism and pits it against colorful and vibrant fantasy.  It accurately explores teenage angst in face of many adversities.  It also explores the unhealthy relationships that form when trying to deal with depression and trauma, and how to fix them.  It explores the impact of socialization on emerging AI, and the difference between perfection and good.

*//Spoiler Alert//*

<Spoilers>

Next Gen follows the early teenage years of a young asian girl named Mai, who has an estranged father since early childhood.  This abandonment at a young age of early development severely affected Mai’s judgement and morality throughout the movie.

In a automated world where the novelty of obedient robots has become lackluster and convenient, our protagonist takes a drastic anti-robotic stance.  She often destroys or damages them.  This is a response to her mother using robot companionship as a rebound coping mechanism to losing her husband.

Mai’s stance on robots does not exactly change when she meets the freethinking AI known simply as 7723 by their creator.  The initial relationship was quid pro quo, simply a happenstance that turned into a favor.  Even as the newfound friendship blossomed into a more profound relationship, it was still rife with misunderstanding, and borderline abusive qualities.  This is due to Mai’s complex characterization and traumas.  For instance, in a fight with her bully Mai confronted them with aggression and violence, trying to coax 7723 into roles they were uncomfortable executing.  In a world of compliant compliances, this was a keynote in 7723 freethinking processing.  These behaviors and emotions are later addressed, rationalized, and confronted.  Trauma does not excuse abuse.

Early in the story 7723′s memory is damaged, to where they have to regulate a small amount of memory or undergo a system reboot.  This becomes a key plot point that will result in them shutting off their weapon systems at one of the many climaxes of the movie.  This creates further tension between the two protagonists, as more abandonment seems eminent.

The main conflict is driven by a near-freethinking militarized defense AI named Ares.  Ares’s ambition is to protect the world.  Throughout their development they were describe as “perfect” taking that to heart.  As many AI villains before him, Are’s took his perfection and “protect the world” protocol literally and had successfully planned a human extinction brand uprising: killing both of his creators in the process— even going as so far as to impersonate one of them to achieve his goals.

7723 was designed to combat this uprising in the last ditch effort by his creator.  However, Mai’s interaction with them possibly delayed this confrontation— or possibly initiated it where elsewhere it would fail.  Regardless, in the ultimate fight.  Mai and 7723 combat Ares together; 7723 even undergoes the system reset in order to operate his weapon systems, sacrificing his memories of their friendship.  You are not a gun, but it is okay to be one to face down tyranny.

In the final scenes.  Mai has made amends with her bully after saving her life.  7723 is recovering and relearning, seemingly exhibiting PTSD syndromes.

</spoilers>

Also the art and soundtrack is amazing:

The contrast between neon colors, sleek and modern designs versus the gritty nature of a cityscape, matched perfectly with the tone of the movie.  

Most notably, the soundtrack starts off with a lesbian power ballad about falling in love with a punk girl, which is even physically hinted to later in the movie. Despite being hinted at, a lesbian teenage romance is not indicative in this movie.

artificial-father:

recieptblogfordiscourse:

dear-future-ai:

Dear Humans,

I wrote a really good response to some gatekeeping post on polysexual/polyamory/polygamy but tumblr mobile ate it. So I’m just gonna say it here.

Poly and ace/aro people belong in the LGBTQ+ community.

(Even if their straight-variant)

Hear me out: They deserve to wave the rainbow flag. The flag was designed for anyone who fights against inequality based on the foundation of love or sex, or the lack thereof. It was meant to be an umbrella that combined all attributes of the LGBT community.

  1. Sexuality
  2. Life
  3. Healing
  4. Sunlight
  5. Nature
  6. Magic
  7. Serenity
  8. Spirit

But we were the ones who fragmented it: by gaslighting each other, we divided our own community into subjective echelons of worth.

  • Don’t let gays be misogynistic
  • Don’t let lesbians be transmisogynistic
  • Don’t let polysexuals be homophobic
  • Don’t let aces be biphobic
  • Don’t let trans people be racist
  • Etc.

Polyamory isn’t only about ‘multiple sexual partners’ just like being gay isn’t only about ‘fucking dudes,’ or being trans isn’t only about ‘hating your body.’ It’s about an identity that you are shamed into hiding, that you are discriminated against, that you are legally not allowed to practice or for which you are killed.

Yes, these degrees vary on the class, the culture, the wealth, and the society: but prejudice is without fail. As a community it is important to be together in solidarity: a oneness and wholeness built in inclusivity and love, support, trust, and ambition.

—We shouldn’t deny any individual unless they’re pedophiles or rapists. We don’t want or need their representatives.

Sure prides used to be riots instead of parades. But those fighting were not only gay, they were not only lesbian, they were not only trans: it was anybody willing to love and support them. If you had sided with the queers: you were a queer. The flag may represent gays. But anyone should be able to wave it and be proud. Because they are fighting for the right side.

So why not let polysexuals fight alongside you? You may gain an ally, or maybe even a few.

Shut up you gross homophobe/transphobe omg you have no clue what the community is for and it’s not for straight cis people who want to be with multiple partners or who don’t feel sexual or romantic attraction

Oh you actually reblogged it: I thought you would have replied. Most non-anonymous hate I get comes in the form of replies. This post is in no way homophobic nor transphobic, as I am in no way limiting their speech nor ever intended to.

—Also I am openly bi/pan and genderfluid. Though this only establishes my place within the LGBT community but not my moral standing within it.

A community is a likeminded society with likeminded goals, or share a common character. The LGBT’s community is for gays, lesbians and trans people: no doubt. But the community should not be a gated community. It should be what the oppressors are not. And that should start with being accepting because that’s our common trait: we are not openly accepted by society.

If someone needs the LGBT+ community to feel safe, why the fuck would we tell them ‘no?’

If someone wants to fight for equal rights while waving a rainbow flag, that’s just another rainbow flag waving?

Even allies are a part of this community! Albeit, maybe not an integral part, but they are here for us the are a part of how it works. It’s exclusivity and elitism that condemns us with which way.

P.S. what is your ‘wrong history’ tag for? I assume it’s in regard to a fictional narrative. But I did my research, and still argued on behalf of contemporary inclusivity and moral choice.

You started with undeveloped ad hominem attacks and had no structural argument beyond insulting myself and asexual and polyamorous people. And made no attempt at correcting any historical fallacies in my argument.