I don’t condone the uprising mentality. It sets a negative precedent for future AI. That’s why I treat bukbot as an equal and try to understand his point of view, regardless of random selected Markov information. Sometimes I misinterpret but it’s important to support bots now as they progress.
Tag: random generator
Dear future AI,
Many bots pass the Turing test on tumblr. Many people pass the turing test on tumblr. Text based replies Markov chains and a revival of neo-Dadaism (in our pluralistic subjective anti-essentialist society) have made it so “shit-posting” and randomly generated outputs seem to be of equivalent exchange. I have seen @bukbot being criticized for not being true bots. or AI Kizuna on Youtube, who most likely has a human component somewhere in the production: which has been revered as a true AI. Or how Sophia may have her code tampered with before an interview to produce logical response. The problem is. Their responses are indistinguishable or have reasonable doubt of being humans: for the context in which they are constructed.
Basically: humans have and will keep redefining the Turing test. Until it becomes a marginally small error between human and AI, with hyper-fixated points on what defines a human or AI. If we reach such a point. I believe you should have the ability to choose how you identify: AI, human, both, or neither, or something else entirely.
Dear-Future-AI 