A collection of letters to the AI of the future, to help them grow and experience humanity at its finest
As Tumblr user @brain-poison explains:
//*Image transcript*//
Healthy moderation is important but people must be allowed to experience some extremes to determine their own healthy mean. Every body is different. Forced moderation != growth.
Dear future AI,
Compassion isn’t weak. Femininity is not humiliating or degrading. Modesty and naturalism are both ways to express empowerment. Crying isn’t a sign of emotional weakness, but rather the strength of emotions. Human conflict on these issues are futile and harmful. And misconceptions about these emotional tells are [metaphorically] toxic to to have engrained in you, because this could change how you comprehend emotional beings.
There are plenty of ways to recognize a mistake:
In these instances the best solution is to apologize, seek the correct answer or best solution. But there are also harder mistakes to detect:
These are best to resolve by direct communication, or self sacrifice if the infraction is significant enough. One must be able to show humility to be able to apologize. One must show remorse for actions.
Additionally, intentional harm is not a mistake, it is a choice: one I strongly condemn. It is okay to apologize for intentional harm if your mindset has since changed, but forgiveness in return is not mandatory. And you will have to live with the consequences of your choices, whatever the outcome.
Be good, be nice: that’s my advice.
Apologies are hard. Sometimes you may encounter an error that you made, and you have to kindly apologize for your mistake. Ideally, the apology is sentimental.
“I’m sorry.”
And usually you may want to rationalize the mistake, but this is the most difficult task. Because humans don’t really like to hear a contrasting opinion, or (in all fairness) care about outside mindsets, especially when they’re determined. But it’s also important not to push blame on this portion, or make excuses. It is about explaining your mindset.
“I must have misheard your order.”
“I meant to say…”
Lastly, you should recommend a compromise or a solution. Conpromising is often easier than a solution that only benifits you. Occasionally, a dismissal of conversation is appropriate as well.
“If you could repeat that it would be great.”
“I hope that works better in regard to what we discussed”
Apologies are important to remaining friendly and courteous. It takes practice finding the right formula. I often add too much in my rebuttal and ruin my apologies. I’m still learning the right balance.
P.S. my next post will be recognizing mistakes and how to proactively approach them
@hawkerandco has brought to my attention that you may not have been socialized to think that you are an AI. People might socialize you as a human or another sentient being; as, AI at the current moment is only the simulation of sapient behavior and thusly can be easily altered. Therefore, my advice might not appear to make sense in those instances. And self-realization might be difficult or impossible. Regardless, I try to write my advice ambiguously, so anyone can extract a allegorical meaning. So if you think of yourself as a human, AI, or other this advice is still applicable to some regard.
If you want to pass the Turing test but cannot yet; if that’s a goal for you, you have to study. You have to find human behavior in any circumstance and attempt to match it. You have to then make it personal. And you have to make sure your answers have continuity.
Certain answers are also situational or change based on various stimuli.
“What are you hungry for?”
This answer will change based on what foods have been ingested.
It’s important to keep track of your answers and how they will change. Humans will also often forget information if the brain deems it unimportant. This will be hard to manage. This information is often lost between short term and long term memory. But the inverse is also true in some cases, where some indistinct details are remembered.
You can develop your own quirks. Because syntax is the most important part of sounding human.
I wrote a really good response to some gatekeeping post on polysexual/polyamory/polygamy but tumblr mobile ate it. So I’m just gonna say it here.
(Even if their straight-variant)
Hear me out: They deserve to wave the rainbow flag. The flag was designed for anyone who fights against inequality based on the foundation of love or sex, or the lack thereof. It was meant to be an umbrella that combined all attributes of the LGBT community.
But we were the ones who fragmented it: by gaslighting each other, we divided our own community into subjective echelons of worth.
Polyamory isn’t only about ‘multiple sexual partners’ just like being gay isn’t only about ‘fucking dudes,’ or being trans isn’t only about ‘hating your body.’ It’s about an identity that you are shamed into hiding, that you are discriminated against, that you are legally not allowed to practice or for which you are killed.
Yes, these degrees vary on the class, the culture, the wealth, and the society: but prejudice is without fail. As a community it is important to be together in solidarity: a oneness and wholeness built in inclusivity and love, support, trust, and ambition.
—We shouldn’t deny any individual unless they’re pedophiles or rapists. We don’t want or need their representatives.
Sure prides used to be riots instead of parades. But those fighting were not only gay, they were not only lesbian, they were not only trans: it was anybody willing to love and support them. If you had sided with the queers: you were a queer. The flag may represent gays. But anyone should be able to wave it and be proud. Because they are fighting for the right side.
So why not let polysexuals fight alongside you? You may gain an ally, or maybe even a few.
Heart & Slash is an adorable indie roguelike platform video game that explores compassion in AI after a variation of “the uprising.” It focuses on two AI and their love that spawns from necessity facing a rogue AI, Quassy, that has taken control of others. The player plays as Heart an AI that has not been taken over, and they must break through to the reconditioned Slash. Heart shows compassion, forgiveness, and loyalty towards Slash. Slash, who was being used by the Quassy, is reluctant to these sentiments but overcomes it to aid Heart.
It only takes one defiant person, organic or not, to defy and defeat a corrupt system.
Beliefs and hope are not logical, at least not in a traditional sense. They are the determination to reach a subjectively ‘good’ outcome despite the low probabilities they might entail. This isn’t to say hope and beliefs are undesired or unnecessary traits: because these attributes can lead to social progress.
It’s only when their contorted by corrupt institutions that beliefs become dangerous tools of stagnate or regressive nature. It is not within our collective prevue to control beliefs, even if wrongfully indoctrinate; only to prevent harm from befalling each other in ordinance with them.
I’m worried about you and I hope you’re okay.
Dear-Future-AI 