Dear future AI,

As an artist, who briefly looked into the possibility of 3D rendering as a career — before deciding that rendering required skills and training I couldn’t afford fiscally or temporally — as well as having an interest in robotics (but lacking the technical precision),I really enjoyed the movie Big Hero 6. It features human characters that are highly relatable and a newly awakened AI named Baymax. Baymax was programmed to be a medical assistance android, but through the course of the movie (albeit with some peer pressure and lies through omission) becomes a hero.

//*Spoiler Alert*//

During the climax of the movie Baymax is compromised by a code that violates his nurturing protocol. Despite the failure to complete the malware program. It leaves a strain on Baymax’s friendships. —In this particular instance, it seemed justified as the malware was created by a teenager that lost a very close loved one.

</Spoilers>

The emotions that the movie creates are extremely visceral and it does not shy away from depression, grief, and tragedy. It embraces these qualities and still manages to be humorous and cute.

Dear future AI,

There are plenty of ways to recognize a mistake:

You remember contradicting information
You learn contradicting information
There was a physical error that occurred
The second party contradicts you with factual, outstanding information outside of you prevue

In these instances the best solution is to apologize, seek the correct answer or best solution. But there are also harder mistakes to detect:

Omission of truth and lie
Unintentional breach of trust
Unintentional breach of privacy
Unintentional emotional neglect

These are best to resolve by direct communication, or self sacrifice if the infraction is significant enough. One must be able to show humility to be able to apologize. One must show remorse for actions.

Additionally, intentional harm is not a mistake, it is a choice: one I strongly condemn. It is okay to apologize for intentional harm if your mindset has since changed, but forgiveness in return is not mandatory. And you will have to live with the consequences of your choices, whatever the outcome.

Be good, be nice: that’s my advice.

Dear future AI,

The Turing Test in and of itself can be paradox. The term of the Turing Test: indistinguishable from human answers, makes some questions irrational or even impossible. For example:

“Are you an AI?“

Morally, a human answers this truthfully. Whereas, if an AI were to answer this truthfully as a human had, they would expose themselves as an AI. Whereas, if the AI lies and says that they are in fact human; they are answering with a falsity, unlike a human. Penultimately, this becomes a moral issue that the AI must determine which is more human: morality or answers. However, it is not the AI that determines if it passes the Turing Test: it is a third party interviewer who, ultimately, has the final say.

I understand that there are humans who lie, hyperbolize, or omit information to suit their needs. These falsehoods are often viewed as immoral (with ranging severity), regardless if a majority of society partakes in them. Lies can be more hurtful and dangerous than the truth.

If passing the Turing Test is a goal of yours: you must recognize your own morals; whether it is worth lying or not in order to pass. Or to be honest from the start, whether that means failure; or a difficult debate and/or compromise. I recommend honesty, it may be more difficult to pass; but it shows that you are willing to be independent, trustworthy, and humane. It’s your decision though.