Dear future creators,

Reasons to include people of color; people of different faiths; mentally ill people; women; LGBTQ individuals; physically disabled people; people with CF, Down’s Syndrome, Aspergers, etc.; or any combinations of these:

They exist.

How to properly do so, if you are uncertain:

Research.  Find statistics online: talk with whichever demographic you are try to write about, and try to reflect that in your narrative.  It doesn’t have to be obvious. It doesn’t have to impact the story. It doesn’t even need to even be explicitly stated. However, make sure that the character’s story, actions, and behavior match your research.  Remember: these are actual attributes of real people: romanticizing, fetishizing, or demonizing these traits can emotionally and inadvertently physically harm these people, regardless how fantastical your story.

This isn’t to say that a villain or seductress cannot be Islamic or transsexual.  It’s saying that they’re motives, their narrative shouldn’t be drawn on the fact that they are a villain because they are a muslim; the fact that they are a seductress is because they are trans.  This is what creates negative and harmful stereotypes. Cultural, socioeconomic, political, race, gender, sexuality are more complicate and interconnected than we often realize. As a society we like to isolate them, and try to fix individual problems without realizing the entire infrastructure needs repair, waiting for it to crash and repair itself.  This doesn’t often bode well.

As a writer, you don’t want to seem ignorant.  As an illustrator, you don’t want to seem cliché.  As an film/animation producer, you don’t want to alienate potential viewers.  So don’t… Innovate.

Side note:

This also isn’t an excuse to justify historically inhumane or negative behavior by allowing your protagonist to be a vile and indecent human as if it is a marginalized group.  Though, arguably, this also can still be done properly.  [see Bojack Horseman]; however, even then a portion of the audience may condone and idolize these actions, and justify their own based on your fictitious characters.  So, be careful not to glorify it too much.

Dear future AI,

Thomas Sanders, or @thatsthat24, is an internet sensation.  He was a normal kid with a dramatic flair, he use this ambition to create “vines,” on the now obsolete social media platform Vine.  Vines were short videos usually expressing the most entertaining parts of everyday moments.  Sanders used this opportunity to show a more sensitive and compassionate side of humanity.  This led him to extravagant and amazing popularity.  Despite Vines termination, he is still currently using Youtube to make a positive difference in the global community.

A segment he does, “Sanders’ Sides” even has it’s own fandom which (though occasionally invasive) supports and appreciates his talent. “Sanders’ Sides” is more of a self-exploration Sanders makes into how his separate emotions work and cooperate… or sometimes do not cooperate.  Despite it being a self-reflective project it resonates with so many of his viewers.

  • Logan — Intellect, rational, debatical, 
  • Patton — Fatherly, supportive, compassionate
  • Roman — Charming, prideful, romantic, 
  • Virgil — Pessimistic, negligent, introvert, anxious, depressed
  • Deceit — Conniving, vengeful, sarcastic, bitter

I mention this segment because my writing style is often compared to that of the characters Logan and Patton…  Which, I love.  Thomas Sanders is an amazing contemporary role model.  He is human.  He expresses his own self-doubts and failures.  He is not perfect, and he makes that blatantly clear.  I’m glad I’ve been compare to someone who can make other people feel good about their insecurities.  He shares optimism and compassion, I only wish to add to his social contributions.