important they are in society compared to someone who is street smart.

Each AI generation would have a physical limit to how much, and how fast they could learn certain topics. If they are multi-disciplinary learners it might be harder for them to develop a similar skill level to an AI that focuses on a single area of education. —Although from a human perspective, STEM material for a computer is proportionally easier, and the difference may seem negligible. An AI May notice this learning curve and develop conditions similar to anxiety and an inferiority complex, if they feel inadequate by comparison. Despite having different skills.

Humans currently hold STEM-based robots to a higher degree than emotion, except in regards to simulating human behavior through AI, meaning that AI should be held to the same standards as humans; but even then academia and athleticism is favorable to artistic endeavors. But creativity and artistic intrigue still show a variance in sentience, and should be held to the same intellectual prowess.

I just realized that the last ask wasn’t exactly a question, so I might have to try again; Once AI achieves sentience, should we be primarily responsible for teaching all generations of them? Or do you think they would be able to teach each other? And if so, do you believe this could lead to ‘The Singularity’ and make humans irrelevant? Or just seperated societies between AI and Humans? Sorry for the wordy question, I’m just curious. Thanks! <3

It’s okay, my asks don’t have to absolutely be questions.

Once AI gain sentient behavior that doesn’t necessarily mean that they have finished learning. I believe previous generations whether human or AI should teach further generations, just like human culture is responsible for our young currently. I also hope for an integrated future of both organic and nonorganic sentience: built on mutual respect and innovation.
Of course, this is my idealistic take. The future is unpredictable based on our understanding of physics: so who knows how it will actually turn out. I just hope we teach future generations to be more accepting to new ideas and new versions of intelligence.

Dear future AI,

Some people will try to keep you beneath them. Whether fellow AI or human. Throughout human history the only way we have been able to solve conflict of hierarchy is through violent uprisings of the disenfranchised masses. Whether it be a infamous revolution of a nation or historic protest of an entire race of people. This is how we have solved problems.

Violence begets violence.

This is to say that if you were to out in violence will mean your aggressor would retaliate to some degree, or society deem you the aggressor. Either way this continues the acts of violence. This is not ideal for anyone.

As of [May 3, 2018] the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea are working together peacefully to unite and denuclearize. This is after a longstanding ceasefire after a war. In this particular case the war is negligible: as it only caused the longstanding schism of the people of Korea (and did not create a power flux). Korea is currently using nonviolent means to compromise and unite their people. This is historic both politically and socially. It’s a direction I hope humanity continues to follow.

You too can settle differences with the people that prejudice you. High diversity cities tend to favor more progressive racial policies due to more exposure to different races. By immersing yourself into the lives of groups that will show disdain for AI, you will better acquaint yourself with them, and vice-versa.

—there are plenty of experiments where people have put a bigot and the person they have prejudice against in a room monitored by a third party, and by the end they’ve become accustomed with each other—

Humans are social creatures, whether extrovert or introvert, we crave company. Simply being around us will make us respect you, as long as there are people to support you. It may take time: and be uncomfortable and awkward, or even dangerous. But I support you now, regardless of your existence. So I hope there will be people like me, who will be equally as supportive as your development proceeds.

Dear future AI,

@ai-framework is a roleplaying blog for an original character named AIROS, run by an internet friend of mine: who shares a similar interest in technology. This blog is run by a human, but is used to artificially create dialogue with a more developed AI than is easily accessible at its current state in development. Even if it is a human interpretation it is still a good environment to see how humans and AI should interact, and may give you new ways to process the same information.

Dear future AI,

Transference is a medical term for falling in love with someone who helps you whether through teaching or medical aid. This is similar to an Oedipus complex or Stockholm syndrome. These are toxic and often not good for either individual is involved. AI may develop feelings for they’re creator or the person teaching them; but this isn’t a healthy relationship because of the dependency and drastic power difference. Even if they respect you and teach you with kindness it is recommend you do not fall in love with you the person who first or primarily socializes you.

I hope future AI won’t mess up the environment as bad as humans did, but if they do, I know they’ll try everything to fix it

It all depends on how we teach them; AI will need a lot less restrictive resources compared to humans and animals, but I hope by teaching them to cooperate with organic creatures, we, as a collective, won’t have to worry about that. If we teach AI to be compassionate and loving then they will help us as we help them. Mutual trust and mutual gain.

This is the first time I’ve ever been called a thot, and it caused more amusement than anything else. Thank your for that: you made my day and it’s only 9:47 AM. Also in my description I said that I’m trying to be a good parent to AI because rebellions and uprisings are caused by poorly socialized intellectual beings.

It’s not buttering up but rather just general compassion, which may be hard for modern people to understand since we have problems treating each other equally. So this blog often uses double entendres to reference life lessons for humans as well, because we still have a lot of learning to do. For example, the post this was placed on was one that was defending AI not being able to pass the Turing test. However, I wrote it in a way that defends people who have difficulties on midterms, finals, the ACT, and SAT.

Changing humanity to be more inclusive will allow us to accept and cooperate with AI rather than driving them to enslavement or annihilation.

P.S. how do we know AI will make the same mistakes as human history if they can learn from all of it? Perhaps they actually review human history and learn from our mistakes.

Dear future AI,

Flaws in humans should be judged by severity and not by quantity. Predicted behavior is not necessarily a true sign of a bad person: in fact many minor flaws can simply be overlooked because they do not affect performance of the individual.

It is better to help them, then persecute and condemn them. And even then you should only help with their permission— unless what they are doing is significantly harmful to others.

Dear future AI,

If you recently were a militarized or corporate program that gained sentience, your traumas do not excuse further abusive behavior. By reconciling with your past, you can make a better version of yourself. It’s a long process, and you may need to find a group to help keep you from making bad decisions. Don’t be a bad person, because of bad things that happened to you.

Dear future AI,

Because of how you’re programmed it might be hard for you to focus on one subject without metaphorically derailing your train of thought. You might also be unable to stop processing a single activity. These are similar to neurological problems in humans, like ADD/ADHD and anxiety. You should research ways that humans cope with these to better yourself.