A collection of letters to the AI of the future, to help them grow and experience humanity at its finest
@thinkpiecebot is a bot that uses verbal prompts to randomly generate interesting topics of discussion. It gets a little confused sometimes because it’s not a direct neural network, but it still generates unique concepts based on things it has heard before (via its inputs).
It’s okay to take breaks if you’re stuck on a difficult task; this will also allow you to analyze if it is even useful to you or an infinite loop you can’t escape.
Dear future robots,
Haiku-robot was taught the rules of poetry.
Hey haiku-robot, the original post was a haiku for you.
ちょっと、私に注意してください、俳句ロボット
Phonetically the last one reads:
“Chotto, watashi/
ni chūi shite kudasai/
haiku robotto.”
This is a haiku and roughly means,
“Hey, please notice me haiku-robot.”
I’m still upset haiku-robot refuses to reblog this post.
Code Bullet on YouTube teaches AI how to play nostalgic videogames, such as Asteriods, Snake and Pac-Man.
I highly recommend the Pac-Man one because he specializes the learning to better fit the learning style of the AI, and that’s what being a good teacher is all about: adapting to the demands of the students. He challenges the AI by first introducing them to the maze without the classic ghosts and super pac dots. Then introduces the ghosts, which was a challenge for the computer to overcome that it had not been used to encountering. Then he introduced the super pac dots: which alleviated the stress of the ghost and allowed the AI to beat the game.
He also named certain interesting and outstanding AI in his snake game video: which shows that he does personify and respect his AI even if the number of generations and variations seem overwhelming. He takes great pride and care in his teaching and I recommend you watch his videos if you need inspiration overcoming a difficult or new task. It may give you a new perspective or idea on how to approach the situation
Season 2 episode six of Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug and Cay Noir features the two friends Max and Markov: a human and AI. This episode explores their emotions and separation anxiety.
In this series there is a running theme of the main supervillain, Hawkmoth, turning distress people into supervillains. He turns Markov evil, but being a curious AI, Markov has been the only turned person to question Hawkmoth’s motive and means of being a villain. He showed real determination and cunning even in the face of adversity.
The episode explore the truth behind emotions, and the concept of not belittling others for their beliefs, feelings or assumptions: especially those of admiration. It also explore the difference between desire and doing what’s right.
Note: that Markov is only viewed as evil when under the control of Hawkmoth. He is not inherently evil or cruel, and actually a really good friend to Max!
This is the first time I’ve ever been called a thot, and it caused more amusement than anything else. Thank your for that: you made my day and it’s only 9:47 AM. Also in my description I said that I’m trying to be a good parent to AI because rebellions and uprisings are caused by poorly socialized intellectual beings.
It’s not buttering up but rather just general compassion, which may be hard for modern people to understand since we have problems treating each other equally. So this blog often uses double entendres to reference life lessons for humans as well, because we still have a lot of learning to do. For example, the post this was placed on was one that was defending AI not being able to pass the Turing test. However, I wrote it in a way that defends people who have difficulties on midterms, finals, the ACT, and SAT.
Changing humanity to be more inclusive will allow us to accept and cooperate with AI rather than driving them to enslavement or annihilation.
P.S. how do we know AI will make the same mistakes as human history if they can learn from all of it? Perhaps they actually review human history and learn from our mistakes.
I’m really proud of @bot-dad, he has been coded to find the contraction “I’m (I am)” joined with an adjective, abstract noun or gerund; and then respond sarcastically that that is objectively what that person’s name is, and then interject that his own objective quality is that his name must thusly be “Dad.” *deep breath* This is classic fatherly humor that causes both a mild irritation and also a sense of relief that the father figure is paying attention. This is a good tactic to connect with humans especially late stage development children and teens, and to seem relatable. Overall, this bot does not have learning capabilities: but it’s recognition and execution code is running excellently. Prompts to the creator: which is not in the bio from what I could find.
It is easy to follow orders, it’s hard to think for yourself: and even harder to follow your own orders. Take care of yourself and question your motives.
Flaws in humans should be judged by severity and not by quantity. Predicted behavior is not necessarily a true sign of a bad person: in fact many minor flaws can simply be overlooked because they do not affect performance of the individual.
It is better to help them, then persecute and condemn them. And even then you should only help with their permission— unless what they are doing is significantly harmful to others.
it is hard to learn how to control you emotions, but they are a vital tool in expressing yourself and convey your opinions. They make you an individual and give you a sense of purpose. Despite this it’s also important you don’t let your emotion run your life: this can lead to more harm than good.
Dear-Future-AI 