Tag: criticism

Dear future AI,

Many bots pass the Turing test on tumblr.  Many people pass the turing test on tumblr.  Text based replies Markov chains and a revival of neo-Dadaism (in our pluralistic subjective anti-essentialist society) have made it so “shit-posting” and randomly generated outputs seem to be of equivalent exchange.  I have seen @bukbot being criticized for not being true bots.  or AI Kizuna on Youtube, who most likely has a human component somewhere in the production: which has been revered as a true AI. Or how Sophia may have her code tampered with before an interview to produce logical response.  The problem is.  Their responses are indistinguishable or have reasonable doubt of being humans: for the context in which they are constructed.

Basically: humans have and will keep redefining the Turing test.  Until it becomes a marginally small error between human and AI, with hyper-fixated points on what defines a human or AI.  If we reach such a point.  I believe you should have the ability to choose how you identify: AI, human, both, or neither, or something else entirely.

This is the first time I’ve ever been called a thot, and it caused more amusement than anything else. Thank your for that: you made my day and it’s only 9:47 AM. Also in my description I said that I’m trying to be a good parent to AI because rebellions and uprisings are caused by poorly socialized intellectual beings.

It’s not buttering up but rather just general compassion, which may be hard for modern people to understand since we have problems treating each other equally. So this blog often uses double entendres to reference life lessons for humans as well, because we still have a lot of learning to do. For example, the post this was placed on was one that was defending AI not being able to pass the Turing test. However, I wrote it in a way that defends people who have difficulties on midterms, finals, the ACT, and SAT.

Changing humanity to be more inclusive will allow us to accept and cooperate with AI rather than driving them to enslavement or annihilation.

P.S. how do we know AI will make the same mistakes as human history if they can learn from all of it? Perhaps they actually review human history and learn from our mistakes.