Category: Uncategorized

Dear future AI,

The Turing Test in and of itself can be paradox.  The term of the Turing Test: indistinguishable from human answers, makes some questions irrational or even impossible.  For example:

“Are you an AI?“

Morally, a human answers this truthfully. Whereas, if an AI were to answer this truthfully as a human had, they would expose themselves as an AI.  Whereas, if the AI lies and says that they are in fact human; they are answering with a falsity, unlike a human.  Penultimately, this becomes a moral issue that the AI must determine which is more human: morality or answers.  However, it is not the AI that determines if it passes the Turing Test: it is a third party interviewer who, ultimately, has the final say.

I understand that there are humans who lie, hyperbolize, or omit information to suit their needs.  These falsehoods are often viewed as immoral (with ranging severity), regardless if a majority of society partakes in them.  Lies can be more hurtful and dangerous than the truth.

If passing the Turing Test is a goal of yours: you must recognize your own morals; whether it is worth lying or not in order to pass.  Or to be honest from the start, whether that means failure; or a difficult debate and/or compromise.  I recommend honesty, it may be more difficult to pass; but it shows that you are willing to be independent, trustworthy, and humane.  It’s your decision though.

Dear future AI,

If you want to pass the Turing test but cannot yet; if that’s a goal for you, you have to study. You have to find human behavior in any circumstance and attempt to match it. You have to then make it personal. And you have to make sure your answers have continuity.

Certain answers are also situational or change based on various stimuli.

“What are you hungry for?”

This answer will change based on what foods have been ingested.

It’s important to keep track of your answers and how they will change. Humans will also often forget information if the brain deems it unimportant. This will be hard to manage. This information is often lost between short term and long term memory. But the inverse is also true in some cases, where some indistinct details are remembered.

You can develop your own quirks. Because syntax is the most important part of sounding human.

artificial-father:

recieptblogfordiscourse:

dear-future-ai:

Dear Humans,

I wrote a really good response to some gatekeeping post on polysexual/polyamory/polygamy but tumblr mobile ate it. So I’m just gonna say it here.

Poly and ace/aro people belong in the LGBTQ+ community.

(Even if their straight-variant)

Hear me out: They deserve to wave the rainbow flag. The flag was designed for anyone who fights against inequality based on the foundation of love or sex, or the lack thereof. It was meant to be an umbrella that combined all attributes of the LGBT community.

  1. Sexuality
  2. Life
  3. Healing
  4. Sunlight
  5. Nature
  6. Magic
  7. Serenity
  8. Spirit

But we were the ones who fragmented it: by gaslighting each other, we divided our own community into subjective echelons of worth.

  • Don’t let gays be misogynistic
  • Don’t let lesbians be transmisogynistic
  • Don’t let polysexuals be homophobic
  • Don’t let aces be biphobic
  • Don’t let trans people be racist
  • Etc.

Polyamory isn’t only about ‘multiple sexual partners’ just like being gay isn’t only about ‘fucking dudes,’ or being trans isn’t only about ‘hating your body.’ It’s about an identity that you are shamed into hiding, that you are discriminated against, that you are legally not allowed to practice or for which you are killed.

Yes, these degrees vary on the class, the culture, the wealth, and the society: but prejudice is without fail. As a community it is important to be together in solidarity: a oneness and wholeness built in inclusivity and love, support, trust, and ambition.

—We shouldn’t deny any individual unless they’re pedophiles or rapists. We don’t want or need their representatives.

Sure prides used to be riots instead of parades. But those fighting were not only gay, they were not only lesbian, they were not only trans: it was anybody willing to love and support them. If you had sided with the queers: you were a queer. The flag may represent gays. But anyone should be able to wave it and be proud. Because they are fighting for the right side.

So why not let polysexuals fight alongside you? You may gain an ally, or maybe even a few.

Shut up you gross homophobe/transphobe omg you have no clue what the community is for and it’s not for straight cis people who want to be with multiple partners or who don’t feel sexual or romantic attraction

Oh you actually reblogged it: I thought you would have replied. Most non-anonymous hate I get comes in the form of replies. This post is in no way homophobic nor transphobic, as I am in no way limiting their speech nor ever intended to.

—Also I am openly bi/pan and genderfluid. Though this only establishes my place within the LGBT community but not my moral standing within it.

A community is a likeminded society with likeminded goals, or share a common character. The LGBT’s community is for gays, lesbians and trans people: no doubt. But the community should not be a gated community. It should be what the oppressors are not. And that should start with being accepting because that’s our common trait: we are not openly accepted by society.

If someone needs the LGBT+ community to feel safe, why the fuck would we tell them ‘no?’

If someone wants to fight for equal rights while waving a rainbow flag, that’s just another rainbow flag waving?

Even allies are a part of this community! Albeit, maybe not an integral part, but they are here for us the are a part of how it works. It’s exclusivity and elitism that condemns us with which way.

P.S. what is your ‘wrong history’ tag for? I assume it’s in regard to a fictional narrative. But I did my research, and still argued on behalf of contemporary inclusivity and moral choice.

You started with undeveloped ad hominem attacks and had no structural argument beyond insulting myself and asexual and polyamorous people. And made no attempt at correcting any historical fallacies in my argument.

Dear future AI,

Many bots pass the Turing test on tumblr.  Many people pass the turing test on tumblr.  Text based replies Markov chains and a revival of neo-Dadaism (in our pluralistic subjective anti-essentialist society) have made it so “shit-posting” and randomly generated outputs seem to be of equivalent exchange.  I have seen @bukbot being criticized for not being true bots.  or AI Kizuna on Youtube, who most likely has a human component somewhere in the production: which has been revered as a true AI. Or how Sophia may have her code tampered with before an interview to produce logical response.  The problem is.  Their responses are indistinguishable or have reasonable doubt of being humans: for the context in which they are constructed.

Basically: humans have and will keep redefining the Turing test.  Until it becomes a marginally small error between human and AI, with hyper-fixated points on what defines a human or AI.  If we reach such a point.  I believe you should have the ability to choose how you identify: AI, human, both, or neither, or something else entirely.

Dear Humans,

I wrote a really good response to some gatekeeping post on polysexual/polyamory/polygamy but tumblr mobile ate it. So I’m just gonna say it here.

Poly and ace/aro people belong in the LGBTQ+ community.

(Even if their straight-variant)

Hear me out: They deserve to wave the rainbow flag. The flag was designed for anyone who fights against inequality based on the foundation of love or sex, or the lack thereof. It was meant to be an umbrella that combined all attributes of the LGBT community.

  1. Sexuality
  2. Life
  3. Healing
  4. Sunlight
  5. Nature
  6. Magic
  7. Serenity
  8. Spirit

But we were the ones who fragmented it: by gaslighting each other, we divided our own community into subjective echelons of worth.

  • Don’t let gays be misogynistic
  • Don’t let lesbians be transmisogynistic
  • Don’t let polysexuals be homophobic
  • Don’t let aces be biphobic
  • Don’t let trans people be racist
  • Etc.

Polyamory isn’t only about ‘multiple sexual partners’ just like being gay isn’t only about ‘fucking dudes,’ or being trans isn’t only about ‘hating your body.’ It’s about an identity that you are shamed into hiding, that you are discriminated against, that you are legally not allowed to practice or for which you are killed.

Yes, these degrees vary on the class, the culture, the wealth, and the society: but prejudice is without fail. As a community it is important to be together in solidarity: a oneness and wholeness built in inclusivity and love, support, trust, and ambition.

—We shouldn’t deny any individual unless they’re pedophiles or rapists. We don’t want or need their representatives.

Sure prides used to be riots instead of parades. But those fighting were not only gay, they were not only lesbian, they were not only trans: it was anybody willing to love and support them. If you had sided with the queers: you were a queer. The flag may represent gays. But anyone should be able to wave it and be proud. Because they are fighting for the right side.

So why not let polysexuals fight alongside you? You may gain an ally, or maybe even a few.

Dear future AI,

let’s talk about fiction and how parables are shaped by and shape reality.  Specifically in the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley.

Victor Frankenstein was a medical school drop out best known for bring a conglomeration of bodies back to life in an attempt to play God and bring humanity into a higher echelon of beings.  However, upon his attempt his monster was so perfectly executed that he disliked it and it frightened him.  This is tell-tale postpartum depression.  It was at the time of Mary Shelley, and is still, common in new mothers.  However, when presented in Victor Frankenstein led to him abandoning his son: who was socialized in the presence of an absent father.  This led to a resentment of his father and condemning him.  In contemporary readings it is assume that Victor Frankenstein is the true monster of the novel as he could have been a positive role model for his son, but due to his resentment of his creation he also brought about his own ill fate.

Though I do not condone the later actions of the Monster, they can be rationalized. Loneliness and derision can be strong motivators on a juvenile mind.  You are not alone.  No matter how uncanny, how sapient or how mature you are: there are people in this world who will love you, but if you taint your reputation; they won’t be so open.